Lusipurr, SiliconNooB, and Imitanis set the record straight by categorically proving (using Science) that the PlayStation era set the stage for some of the greatest games ever made, whilst simultaneously undermining the future of the industry as a whole.
5 Comments
-
There was far more in this show than I can easily respond to with my usual bullet-point style so instead I’ll just say kudos for another great show. I appreciate the consistency and reliability of the staff here, as well as the dedication to delivering the show come hell or high water. May the show and the site live on for many years to come.
@Lusi: Bushido Blade 1 was a novel concept executed roughly. Bushido Blade 2 on the other hand, is a game I have enjoyed playing regularly for over 14 years. I lament that there was never another, as 2 showed the promise of a style that was being refined into something original and exciting. But that Squaresoft no longer exists and neither does the franchise.
-
I really wanted to like SaGa Frontier, and I really tried to play it, but it was just not well-designed. And I was never interested in Legend Of Mana despite loving Secret; I must have been able to tell it was a very different game. Does anyone remember if Brave Fencer Musashi was good? I borrowed it from a friend once and remember liking it because it reminded me of Mystical Ninja Starring Goemon on N64, then never saw it again.
I can see if one was a fan of games like Resident Evil, Silent Hill, and Metal Gear Solid it could have been a great period in gaming, where there was so much starting to be done which was not possible before. For myself, the PS1 was filled almost exclusively with JRPGs and games which happened to be named Castlevania: Symphony Of The Night, and that skewing of genres makes it a generally less memorable era. It certainly was one of the great times in gaming; one could say that the entire 1990’s were the Golden Age, La Belle Époque.