Comments on: Editorial: Greenlight Round-Up, Vol. 32 http://lusipurr.com/2015/07/08/editorial-greenlight-round-up-vol-32/ Tue, 03 May 2016 04:29:50 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.5.1 By: Lusipurr http://lusipurr.com/2015/07/08/editorial-greenlight-round-up-vol-32/#comment-91734 Sun, 12 Jul 2015 00:52:02 +0000 http://lusipurr.com/?p=13026#comment-91734 I still do not understand what is happening in game no. 3.

]]> By: Dancing Matt http://lusipurr.com/2015/07/08/editorial-greenlight-round-up-vol-32/#comment-91731 Sun, 12 Jul 2015 00:12:29 +0000 http://lusipurr.com/?p=13026#comment-91731 What a pile of absolute shit. This is one of the very worst roundup groups. But it’s an amusing and entertaining article, as always.

]]> By: Ferchu http://lusipurr.com/2015/07/08/editorial-greenlight-round-up-vol-32/#comment-91712 Fri, 10 Jul 2015 12:12:35 +0000 http://lusipurr.com/?p=13026#comment-91712 I thought Jim Sterling was part of a heavy metal band, after a google search I find out that he wasn’t .

]]> By: Lusipurr http://lusipurr.com/2015/07/08/editorial-greenlight-round-up-vol-32/#comment-91697 Thu, 09 Jul 2015 19:07:14 +0000 http://lusipurr.com/?p=13026#comment-91697 @Bup: I envy the bliss of not knowing who that fat idiot is.

I wonder how many other rip-offs of Atari 2600 games are on Greenlight. Didn’t you show us a Frogger rip-off last week?

]]> By: Bup http://lusipurr.com/2015/07/08/editorial-greenlight-round-up-vol-32/#comment-91696 Thu, 09 Jul 2015 14:28:59 +0000 http://lusipurr.com/?p=13026#comment-91696 @Lusi: I had to look up Jim Sterling. I guess whoever made that game got really butthurt by him.

]]> By: Lusipurr http://lusipurr.com/2015/07/08/editorial-greenlight-round-up-vol-32/#comment-91664 Wed, 08 Jul 2015 17:41:06 +0000 http://lusipurr.com/?p=13026#comment-91664 The first game is stolen directly from the Atari 2600. It was called “Combat!”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NIHqyfewiCg

The second game uses a picture of Jim Sterling as its face texture. That’s actually illegal and the game should be pulled. There’s no legal defence in using an actual picture of a real person and then claiming that the resemblance to that person is ‘not deliberate’.

As for the third game: what the fuck is even happening?

]]>