<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MAP Episode 39: Natecast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lusipurr.com/2009/11/16/map-episode-39-natecast/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lusipurr.com/2009/11/16/map-episode-39-natecast/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 18:39:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z. Bill</title>
		<link>http://lusipurr.com/2009/11/16/map-episode-39-natecast/#comment-4160</link>
		<dc:creator>Z. Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lusipurr.com/?p=1785#comment-4160</guid>
		<description>It was genius. I consumed it with my ears.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was genius. I consumed it with my ears.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lusipurr</title>
		<link>http://lusipurr.com/2009/11/16/map-episode-39-natecast/#comment-4159</link>
		<dc:creator>Lusipurr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lusipurr.com/?p=1785#comment-4159</guid>
		<description>UPDATE: We have resubmitted the podcast to iTunes. For this to work, we were required to change the Link and Title fields of the podcast. They will be changed back once the podcast is approved.

If you begin to experience difficulties accessing the Megaphones Ahoy! Podcast in the next week or so as a result of these changes, please use the method described above to resubscribe manually.

&lt;i&gt;Hopefully&lt;/i&gt; this process will result in our being relisted on the iTunes store soon. Thanks for understanding!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UPDATE: We have resubmitted the podcast to iTunes. For this to work, we were required to change the Link and Title fields of the podcast. They will be changed back once the podcast is approved.</p>
<p>If you begin to experience difficulties accessing the Megaphones Ahoy! Podcast in the next week or so as a result of these changes, please use the method described above to resubscribe manually.</p>
<p><i>Hopefully</i> this process will result in our being relisted on the iTunes store soon. Thanks for understanding!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lusipurr</title>
		<link>http://lusipurr.com/2009/11/16/map-episode-39-natecast/#comment-4158</link>
		<dc:creator>Lusipurr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lusipurr.com/?p=1785#comment-4158</guid>
		<description>@Darth/Cameron: Correct. If you are already subscribed to the podcast, then you won&#039;t have any problems. The issue exists for people who are trying to find us on the iTunes store to add us for the first time.

I rec&#039;v&#039;d an e-mail from iTunes today though that asks me to change the feed listing and relist it--then to change it back. This may result in your current iTunes subscription failing.

Bear with us (Apple, really) as we try to sort out what is wrong with their system from our end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Darth/Cameron: Correct. If you are already subscribed to the podcast, then you won&#8217;t have any problems. The issue exists for people who are trying to find us on the iTunes store to add us for the first time.</p>
<p>I rec&#8217;v'd an e-mail from iTunes today though that asks me to change the feed listing and relist it&#8211;then to change it back. This may result in your current iTunes subscription failing.</p>
<p>Bear with us (Apple, really) as we try to sort out what is wrong with their system from our end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darthgibblet</title>
		<link>http://lusipurr.com/2009/11/16/map-episode-39-natecast/#comment-4157</link>
		<dc:creator>darthgibblet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 06:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lusipurr.com/?p=1785#comment-4157</guid>
		<description>@CameronS: Yeah, I&#039;m still using iTunes to download MAP, I assumed the problems would be for new subscribers and the like, since it no longer shows up under the iTunes store. I think since we subscribed before it was pulled, iTunes already knows the feed URL and can handle things from there (same as following the Advanced-&gt;Subscribe to Podcast method), but somebody correct me if I&#039;m wrong. Regardless of the technical details, though, I do agree, it was an excellent episode :D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@CameronS: Yeah, I&#8217;m still using iTunes to download MAP, I assumed the problems would be for new subscribers and the like, since it no longer shows up under the iTunes store. I think since we subscribed before it was pulled, iTunes already knows the feed URL and can handle things from there (same as following the Advanced-&gt;Subscribe to Podcast method), but somebody correct me if I&#8217;m wrong. Regardless of the technical details, though, I do agree, it was an excellent episode :D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CameronS</title>
		<link>http://lusipurr.com/2009/11/16/map-episode-39-natecast/#comment-4156</link>
		<dc:creator>CameronS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 04:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lusipurr.com/?p=1785#comment-4156</guid>
		<description>Nate! You stole that still of you off of my Facebook! I believe some reparations are in order...

But anyway, this was probably one of the funniest shows you guys have ever done. I&#039;ve never been so embarrassed to bust out laughing on the bus back to my dorm. And by the way, I&#039;ve been getting the show through iTunes perfectly since day 1... maybe it&#039;s because I&#039;m already subscribed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nate! You stole that still of you off of my Facebook! I believe some reparations are in order&#8230;</p>
<p>But anyway, this was probably one of the funniest shows you guys have ever done. I&#8217;ve never been so embarrassed to bust out laughing on the bus back to my dorm. And by the way, I&#8217;ve been getting the show through iTunes perfectly since day 1&#8230; maybe it&#8217;s because I&#8217;m already subscribed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edge</title>
		<link>http://lusipurr.com/2009/11/16/map-episode-39-natecast/#comment-4155</link>
		<dc:creator>Edge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 02:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lusipurr.com/?p=1785#comment-4155</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m strongly with Lusipurr, Oyashiro, and SN on this one.  DLC is the slipperiest of slopes, and it&#039;s going to get much worse as developers test and extend the limits of how much the consumer will accept. I unfortunately and unwisely purchased the latest Madden and was disgusted with how far they have gone. You are given the option of paying real money over and above the 68 dollar price for things such as alternate uniforms and the ability to manipulate your players stats and other such cheats. Unfortunately, there is no easy solution to halting  all this. Any single person&#039;s boycott will be useless - somehow we need to get a critical mass of consumers to not take part in these &quot;microtransactions&quot;, and be actively angry when a game company crosses the line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m strongly with Lusipurr, Oyashiro, and SN on this one.  DLC is the slipperiest of slopes, and it&#8217;s going to get much worse as developers test and extend the limits of how much the consumer will accept. I unfortunately and unwisely purchased the latest Madden and was disgusted with how far they have gone. You are given the option of paying real money over and above the 68 dollar price for things such as alternate uniforms and the ability to manipulate your players stats and other such cheats. Unfortunately, there is no easy solution to halting  all this. Any single person&#8217;s boycott will be useless &#8211; somehow we need to get a critical mass of consumers to not take part in these &#8220;microtransactions&#8221;, and be actively angry when a game company crosses the line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lusipurr</title>
		<link>http://lusipurr.com/2009/11/16/map-episode-39-natecast/#comment-4154</link>
		<dc:creator>Lusipurr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 08:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lusipurr.com/?p=1785#comment-4154</guid>
		<description>@Darth: NOW we know!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Darth: NOW we know!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darthgibblet</title>
		<link>http://lusipurr.com/2009/11/16/map-episode-39-natecast/#comment-4153</link>
		<dc:creator>darthgibblet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 04:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lusipurr.com/?p=1785#comment-4153</guid>
		<description>Maybe the entire Tomb Raider franchise is actually an elaborate hoax perpetrated by NATE LILES.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe the entire Tomb Raider franchise is actually an elaborate hoax perpetrated by NATE LILES.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SiliconNooB</title>
		<link>http://lusipurr.com/2009/11/16/map-episode-39-natecast/#comment-4152</link>
		<dc:creator>SiliconNooB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 04:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lusipurr.com/?p=1785#comment-4152</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never met anyone who has ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never met anyone who has &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lusipurr</title>
		<link>http://lusipurr.com/2009/11/16/map-episode-39-natecast/#comment-4151</link>
		<dc:creator>Lusipurr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 04:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lusipurr.com/?p=1785#comment-4151</guid>
		<description>Seriously, who plays Tomb Raider? I haven&#039;t ever played ANY of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously, who plays Tomb Raider? I haven&#8217;t ever played ANY of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SiliconNooB</title>
		<link>http://lusipurr.com/2009/11/16/map-episode-39-natecast/#comment-4150</link>
		<dc:creator>SiliconNooB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lusipurr.com/?p=1785#comment-4150</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know ... It&#039;s a Tomb Raider game ... I didn&#039;t play it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know &#8230; It&#8217;s a Tomb Raider game &#8230; I didn&#8217;t play it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bup</title>
		<link>http://lusipurr.com/2009/11/16/map-episode-39-natecast/#comment-4149</link>
		<dc:creator>Bup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lusipurr.com/?p=1785#comment-4149</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t that already happen with Tomb Raider Underworld?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t that already happen with Tomb Raider Underworld?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SiliconNooB</title>
		<link>http://lusipurr.com/2009/11/16/map-episode-39-natecast/#comment-4148</link>
		<dc:creator>SiliconNooB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lusipurr.com/?p=1785#comment-4148</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re missing the point NATE, games have now begun advertising their lack of content within the game world ...

How long until you have to pay extra for the ending?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re missing the point NATE, games have now begun advertising their lack of content within the game world &#8230;</p>
<p>How long until you have to pay extra for the ending?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bup</title>
		<link>http://lusipurr.com/2009/11/16/map-episode-39-natecast/#comment-4147</link>
		<dc:creator>Bup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lusipurr.com/?p=1785#comment-4147</guid>
		<description>I just ran into that guy in my game, and it wasn&#039;t that bad.  Just one of the speech options said something about buying the content, but you could easily just say no.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just ran into that guy in my game, and it wasn&#8217;t that bad.  Just one of the speech options said something about buying the content, but you could easily just say no.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darthgibblet</title>
		<link>http://lusipurr.com/2009/11/16/map-episode-39-natecast/#comment-4146</link>
		<dc:creator>darthgibblet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lusipurr.com/?p=1785#comment-4146</guid>
		<description>@Lusipurr: It&#039;s not that I want to thank our generous burgermeister overlords (which would be an excellent name for a European metal band, btw), more that I just can&#039;t get angry any more about companies screwing customers over. Like you pointed out, if it wasn&#039;t DLC, there would be something else decreasing the content/price ratio. You guys go ahead and fight the power, though, and I wish you the best of luck :D.

RE: Ramstein - I&#039;ve always considered them metal, but maybe my definition of &quot;metal&quot; is off. Just chock that up in the &quot;stupid crap I&#039;ve said this week&quot; category :F.

RE: Otherworld - This is one of the few Uematsu pieces where I prefer the original to the Black Mages version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Lusipurr: It&#8217;s not that I want to thank our generous burgermeister overlords (which would be an excellent name for a European metal band, btw), more that I just can&#8217;t get angry any more about companies screwing customers over. Like you pointed out, if it wasn&#8217;t DLC, there would be something else decreasing the content/price ratio. You guys go ahead and fight the power, though, and I wish you the best of luck :D.</p>
<p>RE: Ramstein &#8211; I&#8217;ve always considered them metal, but maybe my definition of &#8220;metal&#8221; is off. Just chock that up in the &#8220;stupid crap I&#8217;ve said this week&#8221; category :F.</p>
<p>RE: Otherworld &#8211; This is one of the few Uematsu pieces where I prefer the original to the Black Mages version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SiliconNooB</title>
		<link>http://lusipurr.com/2009/11/16/map-episode-39-natecast/#comment-4145</link>
		<dc:creator>SiliconNooB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lusipurr.com/?p=1785#comment-4145</guid>
		<description>-And so it begins ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>-And so it begins &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SiliconNooB</title>
		<link>http://lusipurr.com/2009/11/16/map-episode-39-natecast/#comment-4144</link>
		<dc:creator>SiliconNooB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lusipurr.com/?p=1785#comment-4144</guid>
		<description>&quot;We spent quite a bit of time trying to determine how we felt about the Dragon Age situation described in today&#039;s comic - a character appears in your camp who offers a questline that is only available in downloadable content. The character is literally a salesman.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We spent quite a bit of time trying to determine how we felt about the Dragon Age situation described in today&#8217;s comic &#8211; a character appears in your camp who offers a questline that is only available in downloadable content. The character is literally a salesman.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SiliconNooB</title>
		<link>http://lusipurr.com/2009/11/16/map-episode-39-natecast/#comment-4143</link>
		<dc:creator>SiliconNooB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lusipurr.com/?p=1785#comment-4143</guid>
		<description>This seemed appropriate. Expect more of this with DLC.



http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2009/11/6/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seemed appropriate. Expect more of this with DLC.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2009/11/6/" rel="nofollow">http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2009/11/6/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SiliconNooB</title>
		<link>http://lusipurr.com/2009/11/16/map-episode-39-natecast/#comment-4142</link>
		<dc:creator>SiliconNooB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lusipurr.com/?p=1785#comment-4142</guid>
		<description>Certainly not! That was written by Uematsu, performed with the help of people from the Black Mages (I think?) and sang by Bill Muir.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Certainly not! That was written by Uematsu, performed with the help of people from the Black Mages (I think?) and sang by Bill Muir.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kenjujuu</title>
		<link>http://lusipurr.com/2009/11/16/map-episode-39-natecast/#comment-4141</link>
		<dc:creator>kenjujuu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 19:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lusipurr.com/?p=1785#comment-4141</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t Rammstein do the Otherworld piece from the Zanarkand FMV in the start of Final Fantasy X?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t Rammstein do the Otherworld piece from the Zanarkand FMV in the start of Final Fantasy X?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SiliconNooB</title>
		<link>http://lusipurr.com/2009/11/16/map-episode-39-natecast/#comment-4140</link>
		<dc:creator>SiliconNooB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lusipurr.com/?p=1785#comment-4140</guid>
		<description>&quot;@Bup: Man, I haven’t heard Du Hast in forever. Gotta love European metal!&quot;

Ramnstein aren&#039;t Metal ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;@Bup: Man, I haven’t heard Du Hast in forever. Gotta love European metal!&#8221;</p>
<p>Ramnstein aren&#8217;t Metal &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oyashiro</title>
		<link>http://lusipurr.com/2009/11/16/map-episode-39-natecast/#comment-4139</link>
		<dc:creator>Oyashiro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 10:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lusipurr.com/?p=1785#comment-4139</guid>
		<description>Great, now I&#039;m hungry...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great, now I&#8217;m hungry&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lusipurr</title>
		<link>http://lusipurr.com/2009/11/16/map-episode-39-natecast/#comment-4138</link>
		<dc:creator>Lusipurr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 09:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lusipurr.com/?p=1785#comment-4138</guid>
		<description>@Darth: The idea that people will not buy a game because it has &lt;i&gt;by degrees less content&lt;/i&gt; than they previously got for the same price is ludicrous. As evidence, people are now paying $60 for less content than they got just a few years ago for $50. Are you trying to tell me that less is more? I&#039;m not buying that for a moment. Many of the games I played in the past are capable of beating the more recent stuff clean. Yet this has no impact on the price--and neither does it have on me buying it, or on you, or on anyone else really. After all, what alternative do you have? Where are all the $50 games with more content? So much for the illusion of competition. When everyone is running the same rigged game, it doesn&#039;t matter who you play with.

These things are not done in an instant, by leaps and bounds, but bitwise. The changes are gradual, and people work hard to convince themselves that they aren&#039;t chumps who are getting shafted a little more each year. But delude yourself as you may--you&#039;re a chump, and so am I, and so are all of us. But again, what choice have you? &quot;You can give up games entirely if you don&#039;t like it.&quot; Really, that&#039;s not much of a choice, is it? So withold your sale, and see what good it does--because the reality is that (most!) other people will still buy it and the enlarged profits will more than make up for the loss of a few silly people who think their one-man boycott will change the world.

Let&#039;s square it away: if you are paying $60 for a game today that has less content than a game you would have bought for $50 three years ago, then you may well comfort yourself by saying that you still think there is $60 of value there--but what does that say about your previous purchase? Was it &lt;i&gt;over&lt;/i&gt;valued? I&#039;m not about to smile and say that paying $50 for PS2/GC games was a generous gift from benevolent Sonytendo just to avoid the possibility of cognitive dissonance.

The reality is that you can&#039;t have it both ways. Either you are paying too much now, or you weren&#039;t paying enough in the past. Personally, I think I was paying enough in the past. Will you tell me otherwise? Were you running about five years ago cheering about how awesome a deal it was to be getting games for $50 a pop plus tax?

Let us take your theory to the logical extreme. If the value of a game is purely set on the basis of the individual consumer, at what point will they stop? 70? 80? 90? How much would you pay for a Final Fantasy game regardless of the content? I know if they priced FFXIII at $100, I&#039;d pay up. I&#039;d probably pay up if it was $125. I bet a lot of other people would too. Are we to be told that gouging people is right just because they&#039;ll grudgingly pay up?

Exploitative capitalism and rightness are clean different things. If you want to try and restore the balance, you can stop defending these practices and instead hold them up to the acrimony they richly deserve--and would have received if undertaken just a few years ago. That is the job of the media--indeed it is the &lt;i&gt;responsibility&lt;/i&gt; of the media. More visible outlets have divested themselves of their responsibility to consumers of late, but that does not make the actions of corporations any more right. Neither does it free us, at this media outlet, of our obligation to resist to the ultimate limit attempts to condition consumers into believing that being shafted is &#039;okay&#039; because somehow, getting less for more is still &#039;getting your money&#039;s worth&#039;.

The fact is that if a year ago I got a hamburger for a dollar, and now I only get three-quarters of a hamburger for a dollar and a half, it does me no real good to say &quot;well it is still tasty.&quot; The fact is that I have &lt;i&gt;less&lt;/i&gt;, I paid &lt;i&gt;more&lt;/i&gt;, and I can expect that in future this trend will continue as long as people ardently defend it by saying &quot;it&#039;s so tasty that you should be &lt;b&gt;GLAD&lt;/b&gt; you are getting as much as 3/4 of a burger! How &lt;i&gt;generous&lt;/i&gt; the burgermeister is!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Darth: The idea that people will not buy a game because it has <i>by degrees less content</i> than they previously got for the same price is ludicrous. As evidence, people are now paying $60 for less content than they got just a few years ago for $50. Are you trying to tell me that less is more? I&#8217;m not buying that for a moment. Many of the games I played in the past are capable of beating the more recent stuff clean. Yet this has no impact on the price&#8211;and neither does it have on me buying it, or on you, or on anyone else really. After all, what alternative do you have? Where are all the $50 games with more content? So much for the illusion of competition. When everyone is running the same rigged game, it doesn&#8217;t matter who you play with.</p>
<p>These things are not done in an instant, by leaps and bounds, but bitwise. The changes are gradual, and people work hard to convince themselves that they aren&#8217;t chumps who are getting shafted a little more each year. But delude yourself as you may&#8211;you&#8217;re a chump, and so am I, and so are all of us. But again, what choice have you? &#8220;You can give up games entirely if you don&#8217;t like it.&#8221; Really, that&#8217;s not much of a choice, is it? So withold your sale, and see what good it does&#8211;because the reality is that (most!) other people will still buy it and the enlarged profits will more than make up for the loss of a few silly people who think their one-man boycott will change the world.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s square it away: if you are paying $60 for a game today that has less content than a game you would have bought for $50 three years ago, then you may well comfort yourself by saying that you still think there is $60 of value there&#8211;but what does that say about your previous purchase? Was it <i>over</i>valued? I&#8217;m not about to smile and say that paying $50 for PS2/GC games was a generous gift from benevolent Sonytendo just to avoid the possibility of cognitive dissonance.</p>
<p>The reality is that you can&#8217;t have it both ways. Either you are paying too much now, or you weren&#8217;t paying enough in the past. Personally, I think I was paying enough in the past. Will you tell me otherwise? Were you running about five years ago cheering about how awesome a deal it was to be getting games for $50 a pop plus tax?</p>
<p>Let us take your theory to the logical extreme. If the value of a game is purely set on the basis of the individual consumer, at what point will they stop? 70? 80? 90? How much would you pay for a Final Fantasy game regardless of the content? I know if they priced FFXIII at $100, I&#8217;d pay up. I&#8217;d probably pay up if it was $125. I bet a lot of other people would too. Are we to be told that gouging people is right just because they&#8217;ll grudgingly pay up?</p>
<p>Exploitative capitalism and rightness are clean different things. If you want to try and restore the balance, you can stop defending these practices and instead hold them up to the acrimony they richly deserve&#8211;and would have received if undertaken just a few years ago. That is the job of the media&#8211;indeed it is the <i>responsibility</i> of the media. More visible outlets have divested themselves of their responsibility to consumers of late, but that does not make the actions of corporations any more right. Neither does it free us, at this media outlet, of our obligation to resist to the ultimate limit attempts to condition consumers into believing that being shafted is &#8216;okay&#8217; because somehow, getting less for more is still &#8216;getting your money&#8217;s worth&#8217;.</p>
<p>The fact is that if a year ago I got a hamburger for a dollar, and now I only get three-quarters of a hamburger for a dollar and a half, it does me no real good to say &#8220;well it is still tasty.&#8221; The fact is that I have <i>less</i>, I paid <i>more</i>, and I can expect that in future this trend will continue as long as people ardently defend it by saying &#8220;it&#8217;s so tasty that you should be <b>GLAD</b> you are getting as much as 3/4 of a burger! How <i>generous</i> the burgermeister is!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric J</title>
		<link>http://lusipurr.com/2009/11/16/map-episode-39-natecast/#comment-4137</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 08:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lusipurr.com/?p=1785#comment-4137</guid>
		<description>I like games!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like games!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SiliconNooB</title>
		<link>http://lusipurr.com/2009/11/16/map-episode-39-natecast/#comment-4136</link>
		<dc:creator>SiliconNooB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 07:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lusipurr.com/?p=1785#comment-4136</guid>
		<description>Well if a FULL game is worth $60, then I have to figure that an incomplete game is worth something less than that ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well if a FULL game is worth $60, then I have to figure that an incomplete game is worth something less than that &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

